No tie to any scheme or operator
The only textile EPR practice paid to make the fee smaller.
Fee = perimeter × mass × rate − reductions. Every term is negotiable with data — that is the whole practice.
Who this is for
The operations manager at a €3–12M Spanish or Italian brand, running 400–1,200 active references across two or three collections and a permanent line, selling at home and into France.
France is the detail that matters: the fee is already live there, and Refashion has already made the number feel arbitrary once.
The offer
EPR fees are not a tax. They are a formula.
Every term on the right side of that equation is negotiable with data — the perimeter a reference falls into, the mass declared for it, the rate a scheme applies, the reductions it qualifies for. Tessia works each one.
The trigger is never hers
A decree publishes.
A ministry amends the perimeter, or the mass rate, or a reduction — in a text that is dated, public, and never announced to her directly.
One screen, one number
The abstract law becomes a number about her company.
She sees her own gross-margin range for textile EPR, computed from her own product mix. Checkout sits directly below it.
Sample screen — figures shown are illustrative
18.2% – 21.6%
Computed from a 640-reference mix across four categories.
Checkout — sample
12 months of access
One payment. No lock-in.
Price
Twelve months, one payment.
Access is sold as a single fixed-price purchase through hosted checkout — one payment covers twelve months, with no lock-in. Because billing runs one-time or monthly only, the year is sold as one item rather than split into a subscription.
Before access lapses, renewal is offered by email.